I was reading this thread
https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/from-life-before-main-to-common-life-in-main/16006/30
and that reminded me about this code, which it turns out actually
doesn't compile with my default local cargo config:
```
$ cat ~/.cargo/config
[target.x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu]
rustflags = ["-Ctarget-cpu=native", "-C", "link-arg=-fuse-ld=lld"]
[profile.release]
incremental = true
$ cargo b
...
error: linking with `cc` failed: exit status: 1
|
= note: "cc" "-m64" "/var/srv/walters/src/github/ostreedev/ostree/target/debug/deps/ostree_test-4ca8e730f9dc6ffc.10325uqlhkyr5uol.rcgu.o" "/var/srv/walte"
= note: ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __start_linkme_NONDESTRUCTIVE_TESTS
>>> referenced by 22nn09lfsklfqvyy
>>> /var/srv/walters/src/github/ostreedev/ostree/target/debug/deps/ostree_test-4ca8e730f9dc6ffc.22nn09lfsklfqvyy.rcgu.o:(ostree_tes)
```
For now let's just go back to having a static list of functions.
We don't have *too* many of those.
And I made a few more API tweaks, such as supporting `Path`
objects directly and also not needing e.g. `commit = commit`, see
- cfa7c71126
- 679bce4cc7
This adds infrastructure to the Rust test suite for destructive
tests, and adds a new `transactionality` test which runs
rpm-ostree in a loop (along with `ostree-finalize-staged`) and
repeatedly uses either `kill -9`, `reboot` and `reboot -ff`.
The main goal here is to flush out any "logic errors".
So far I've validated that this passes a lot of cycles
using
```
$ kola run --qemu-image=fastbuild-fedora-coreos-ostree-qemu.qcow2 ext.ostree.destructive-rs.transactionality --debug --multiply 8 --parallel 4
```
a number of times.
There's a lot going on here. First, this is intended to run
nicely as part of the new [cosa/kola ext-tests](https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler/pull/1252).
With Rust we can get one big static binary that we can upload,
and include a webserver as part of the binary. This way we don't
need to do the hack of running a container with Python or whatever.
Now, what's even better about Rust for this is that it has macros,
and specifically we are using [commandspec](https://github.com/tcr/commandspec/)
which allows us to "inline" shell script. I think the macros
could be even better, but this shows how we can intermix
pure Rust code along with using shell safely enough.
We're using my fork of commandspec because the upstream hasn't
merged [a few PRs](https://github.com/tcr/commandspec/pulls?q=is%3Apr+author%3Acgwalters+).
This model is intended to replace *both* some of our
`make check` tests as well.
Oh, and this takes the obvious step of using the Rust OSTree bindings
as part of our tests. Currently the "commandspec tests" and "API tests"
are separate, but nothing stops us from intermixing them if we wanted.
I haven't yet tried to write destructive tests with this but
I think it will go well.
Colin Walters