The recent change in https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/659
broke some of our tests that do `mount -o remount,rw /sysroot` but
leave `/boot` read-only.
We had code for having `/boot` read-only before `/sysroot` but
in practice we had a file descriptor for `/sysroot` that we opened
before the remount that would happen later on.
Clean things up here so that in the library, we also remount
`/boot` at the same time we remount `/sysroot` if either are readonly.
Delete the legacy code for remounting `/boot` rw if we're not in
a mount namespace. I am fairly confident most users are either
using the `ostree` CLI, or they're using the mount namespace.
Just like we hold a fd for `/sysroot`, also do so for `/boot`
instead of opening and closing it in a few places.
This is a preparatory cleanup for further work.
I was being very conservative initially here, but I think it's
really safe to just unconditionally set up the mount namespace.
This avoids having to check twice for a read-only `/sysroot`
(once in the binary and once in the library).
In some cases such as backups or mirroring you may want to pull commits
from one repo to another even if there commits that have incorrect
bindings. Fixing the commits in the source repository to have correct
bindings may not be feasible, so provide a pull option to disable
verification.
For Endless we have several repositories that predate collection IDs and
ref bindings. Later these repositories gained collection IDs to support
the features they provide and ref bindings as the ostree tooling was
upgraded. These repositories contain released commits that were valid to
the clients they were targeting at the time. Correcting the bindings is
not really an option as it would mean invalidating the repository
history.
If this is not done, the test can fail when the temporary directory is
a tmpfs: for example this happens during build-time testing with /var/tmp
on tmpfs or TEST_TMPDIR pointing to a tmpfs, or installed-tests with
gnome-desktop-testing-runner allocating the test directory on a tmpfs.
In particular, many of Debian's official autobuilders now do the entire
build and test procedure in a chroot hosted on a tmpfs, to improve build
performance and prevent fsync overhead.
In this situation, it appears that overwriting summary.sig with a copy
of summary.sig.2 is not sufficient for the web server to tell the
libostree client that it needs to be re-downloaded. I'm not completely
sure why, because tmpfs does appear to have sub-second-resolution
timestamps, but forcing a distinct mtime is certainly enough to
resolve it.
Resolves: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/2245
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/975418
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
This tweaks the release GH workflow further so that it only triggers
when the `configure.ac` file (which owns the version) changes.
Plus it properly checkouts the PR branch to avoid wrongly looking
at a synthetic merge commit.
The cache shouldn't be affected by the user passing in some other
summary as it may not be the "official one".
I ran into this in flatpak where the passed summary was correct, but
the re-saving of the cache updated the mtime of the cached file which
led to later http If-Modified-Since calls failing to update.
As detailed in
gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/600#note_877282, volatile
isn't actually needed in these contexts because the atomic operations
already give us strong enough guarantees. In GCC 11, this triggers a
diagnostic due to the volatile qualifier getting dropped anyway.
There is a WIP to do the same in glib:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/merge_requests/1719
This obsoletes this downstream patch:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ostree/c/b8c5a6fb
I got:
src/libostree/ostree-repo.c:5232: Warning: OSTree: ostree_repo_gpg_sign_data: unknown parameter 'out_signature' in documentation comment, should be 'out_signatures'
The timeout timer should always be one-shot, so let's just always
destroy it in the callback. The main context has its own ref on it, so
it won't be freed behind its back.
This *should* fix a leak that was brought up in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891761.
Reported-by: Milan Crha <mcrha@redhat.com>
Colin Walters
OpenShift Merge Robot
Dan Nicholson
Phaedrus Leeds
Javier Jardón
Simon McVittie
Luca BRUNO
William Manley
Alexander Larsson
Jonathan Lebon