To aid debuggability, when we find a commit that isn't signed
by our expected key, output a specific error message with the
key.
(And then add code to switch to just printing the count beyond 3
because the test suite injects 100 keys and hopefully no one
ever actually does that)
Align with --from-file and use 'FILE' instead of 'PATH' as option
argument string. No functional change, this is only cosmetics.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan.agner@toradex.com>
Add a standard key for this. We actually had a case in OpenShift
builds recently where a `ppc64le` image was pushed over an `x86_64`
one and this started failing at runtime with a not immediately
obvious error.
I'll probably end up changing rpm-ostree at least to use
the RPM architecture for this key and fail if it doesn't match
the booted value.
Possibly that should live in ostree but it would involve adding
architecture schema here, which gets into a big mess. Let's
just standardize the key.
xref e02ef2683d
One OpenShift user saw this from rpm-ostree:
```
client(id:cli dbus:1.583 unit:machine-config-daemon-host.service uid:0) added; new total=1
Initiated txn UpdateDeployment for client(id:cli dbus:1.583 unit:machine-config-daemon-host.service uid:0): /org/projectatomic/rpmostree1/rhcos
Txn UpdateDeployment on /org/projectatomic/rpmostree1/rhcos failed: File header size 4294967295 exceeds size 0
```
which isn't very helpful. Let's add some error
prefixing here which would at least tell us which
object was corrupted.
In 588f42e8c6
we added a way to add keys for sign types when doing
a `remote add`, and in https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/2105
we extended `sign-verify` to support *limiting* to an explicit
set.
This PR changes the *default* for `remote add` to combine
the two - when providing an explicit `--sign-verify=type`,
we now limit the accepted types to only those.
We recently disabled the read-only /sysroot handling:
e35b82fb89
The core problem was that a lot of services run early in the
real root and want write access to things like `/var` and `/etc`.
In trying to do remounts while the system is running we introduce
too many race conditions.
Instead, just make the `/etc` bind mount in the initramfs right
after we set up the main root. This is much more natural really,
and avoids all race conditions since nothing is running in the
sysroot yet.
The main awkward part is that since we're not linking
`ostree-prepare-root` to GLib (yet) we have a hacky parser
for the config file. But, this is going to be fine I think.
In order to avoid parsing the config twice, pass state from
`ostree-prepare-root` to `ostree-remount` via a file in `/run`.
The goal here is to move the code towards a model
where the *client* can explicitly specify which signature types
are acceptable.
We retain support for `sign-verify=true` for backwards compatibility.
But in that configuration, a missing public key is just "no signatures found".
With `sign-verify=ed25519` and no key configured, we can
explicitly say `No keys found for required signapi type ed25519`
which is much, much clearer.
Implementation side, rather than maintaining `gboolean sign_verify` *and*
`GPtrArray sign_verifiers`, just have the array. If it's `NULL` that means
not to verify.
Note that currently, an explicit list is an OR of signatures, not AND.
In practice...I think most people are going to be using a single entry
anyways.
There's a lot of historical baggage associated with GPG verification
and `ostree pull` versus `ostree pull-local`. In particular nowadays,
if you use a `file://` remote things are transparently optimized
to e.g. use reflinks if available.
So for anyone who doesn't trust the "remote" repository, you should
really go through through the regular
`ostree remote add --sign-verify=X file://`
path for example.
Having a mechanism to say "turn on signapi verification" *without*
providing keys goes back into the "global state" debate I brought
up in https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/2080
It's just much cleaner architecturally if there is exactly one
path to find keys: from a remote config.
So here in contrast to the GPG code, for `pull-local` we explictily
disable signapi validation, and the `ostree_repo_pull()` API just
surfaces flags to disable it, not enable it.
For the same reason as https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/pull/2094.
What we care most about is that the new commit we pull is newer than the
one we're currently sitting on, not necessarily that it's newer than the
branch itself, which it might not be if e.g. we're trying to deploy a
commit older than the tip but still newer than the deployment (via
`--override-commit`).
The way `timestamp-check` works might be too restrictive in some
situations. Essentially, we need to support the case where users want to
pull an older commit than the current tip, but while still guaranteeing
that it is newer than some even older commit.
This will be used in Fedora CoreOS. For more information see:
https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/pull/2094https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/481
In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827712
some OpenShift CI is seeing `/boot` being unmounted before
`ostree-finalize-staged.service` runs or completes.
We finally tracked this down to a bug elsewhere, but
I think we should add this because it clearly shows
our requirements.
Previously in the pull code, every time we went to verify
a commit we would re-initialize an `OstreeSign` instance
of each time, re-parse the remote configuration
and re-load its public keys etc.
In most cases this doesn't matter really because we're
pulling one commit, but if e.g. pulling a commit with
history would get a bit silly.
This changes things so that the pull code initializes the
verifiers once, and reuses them thereafter.
This is continuing towards changing the code to support
explicitly configured verifiers, xref
https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/2080
This cleans up the verification code; it was weird how
we'd get the list of known names and then try to create
an instance from it (and throw an error if that failed, which
couldn't happen).
Per https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/2080#issuecomment-623614483
A huge benefit of ed25519 (and ECC in general) is that keys are very
short - short enough that it's completely reasonable to inline
them into a command line argument.
And I think that's a good model; it makes the keys very visible.
For example, someone could easily copy-paste a commandline
argument from a webpage (secured via TLS) that says to run
`ostree remote add --sign-verify=ed25519=inline:KEY`.
With just `After=` we'll still try to run in the scenario
where `sysroot.mount` fails because the rootfs didn't appear.
And this will end up spewing an error which can confuse people
into thinking something is wrong at the ostree level.
This has come up numerous times w/{Fedora,RHEL} CoreOS, most
recently while looking at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803130
I think we should encourage removing the writable bits from
executables. This has happened to me:
https://thomask.sdf.org/blog/2019/11/09/take-care-editing-bash-scripts.html
And not having the writable bit may help prevent hardlink
corruption with OSTree in some cases.
We can't do this by default, but add a convenient CLI flag
for it.
The GI scanner decides if an `enum` is really a `bitfield` if it finds
any values that have left shifts. With an `enumeration`, the
introspecting language may error or convert to a different type if the
user tries to combine values. Change all Flags `enum`s to use
left-shifted values so that they're represented as `bitfield`s in the
GIR.
The primary bug here is that you can't combine `REFS_ONLY` and
`NO_PRUNE` when calling `OSTree.Repo.prune()` from an introspected
language.
This is an IABI break since the typelib will change from `enumeration`
to `bitfield`. `OstreeRepoImportFlags` is internal but the change is
included here to prepare for a subsequent name that would require bit
shifting to operate correctly as a flag.
Explicitly expose functions for querying the metadata format
and key name used by OstreeSign object:
- ostree_sign_metadata_format
- ostree_sign_metadata_key
This allows to use the same metadata format and key name
by 3-rd party applications using signapi.
Signed-off-by: Denis Pynkin <denis.pynkin@collabora.com>
Same motivation as
https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/pull/2060
I tried `InaccessiblePaths=/var` first and was very sad to find
out we have one tiny exception that breaks it. Otherwise it'd
be so elegant. Maybe in the future we split out that one thing
to a separate `ostree-finalized-stage-var.service` that's just
`ExecStart=/bin/rm -vf /var/.updated` and is otherwise
`ProtectSystem=strict` etc.
All of the underlying libostree APIs have supported passing `NULL`
for a merge deployment for...a long time. But we never plumbed
it up into the CLI.
Add a `--no-merge` option to aid people who want to do a "factory reset":
https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/1793
I've only noticed this by inspection. But I think it's possible for
`cleanup_txn_dir` to get called with the `staging-...-lock` file since
it matches the prefix.
Make the checking here stronger by verifying that it's a directory. If
it's not a directory (lockfile), then follow the default pruning expiry
logic so that we still cleanup stray lockfiles eventually.
`ostree-repo-pull.c` is rather monstrous; I plan to split it
up a bit. There's actually already a `pull-private.h` but
that's just for the binding verification API. I think that one
isn't really pull specific. Let's move it into the "catchall"
`repo.c`.
Previously we would pass the `verification-key` and `verification-file`
to all backends, ignoring errors from loading keys until we
found one that worked.
Instead, change the options to be `verification-<engine>-key`
and `verification-<engine>-file`, and then
rework this to use standard error handling; barf explicitly if
we can't load the public keys for example. Preserve
the semantics of accepting the first valid signature. The
first signature error is captured, the others are currently
compressed into a `(and %d more)` prefix.
And now that I look at this more closely there's a lot of
duplication between the two code paths in pull.c for verifying;
will dedup this next.
I'm mainly doing this to sanity check the CI state right now.
However, I also want to more cleanly/clearly distinguish
the "sign" code from the "gpg" code.
Rename one function to include `gpg`.
For the other...I think what it's really doing is using the remote
config, so change it to include `remote` in its name.
If GPG support is disabled in a build time we should to check if any of
options "gpg_verify" or "gpg_verify_summary" is set to TRUE instead
of checking if they are passed via options while pulling from remote.
Fixed the failure with assertion of `ostree find-remotes --pull --mirror`
calling (`tests/test-pull-collections.sh`) if libostree has been compiled
without GPG support.
Signed-off-by: Denis Pynkin <denis.pynkin@collabora.com>
I was trying to followup the `--selinux-policy-from-base` work
to add a `cosa build --fast=overlay` for coreos-assembler,
but hit on the fact that using e.g. `--owner-uid` disables
commit optimizations.
A while ago, https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/1643 landed
which optimized this for the case where no modifications are provided.
But, we really need the SELinux policy bits, and it's super convenient
to run `ostree commit` as non-root.
It's fairly surprising actually that it's taken us so long to
iterate on a good interface for this "commit changes on top of a base"
model. In practice, many nontrivial cases really end up needing
to do a (hardlink) checkout, and that case is optimized.
But for this coreos-assembler work I want to directly overlay onto
a commit object another commit object.
That previous PR above added exactly the API we need, so let's
expose it in the CLI.
What you can see happening in the test is that we provide
`--owner-uid 42`, but that only applies to directories/files
that were added in the commit.
And now that I look at this, I think what we really want here
is to avoid changing directories that exist in the base, but
eh; in practice the main use here is for `--owner-uid 0` while
committing as non-root; and that works fine with this since
the baseline uid will be zero as well.
This is another attempt to avoid having duplicated menu entries caused by
GRUB having support to parse BLS snippets and the 15_ostree script adding
menu entries as well.
The previous attempt was in commit 985a141002 ("grub2: Exit gracefully if
the configuration has BLS enabled") but that lead to users not having menu
entries at all, due having an old GRUB version that was not able to parse
the BLS snippets.
This happened because the GRUB bootloader is never updated in the ESP as
a part of the OSTree upgrade transaction.
The logic is similar to the previous commit, the 15_ostree script exits if
able to determine that the bootloader can parse the BLS snippets directly.
But this time it will not only check that a BLS configuration was enabled,
but also that a /boot/grub2/.grub2-blscfg-supported file exists. This file
has to be created by a component outside of OSTree that also takes care of
updating GRUB to a version that has proper BLS support.
This code wasn't written with idiomatic GError usage; it's not standard
to construct an error up front and continually append to its
message. The exit from a function is usually `return TRUE`,
with error conditions before that.
Updating it to match style reveals what I think is a bug;
we were silently ignoring failure to parse key files.
Colin Walters
OpenShift Merge Robot
Denis Pynkin
Stefan Agner
Jonathan Lebon
Dan Nicholson
Javier Martinez Canillas