Apparently I got the bracketing wrong in
862e6ecdcc:
src/libostree/ostree-repo.c: In function 'ostree_repo_delete_object':
src/libostree/ostree-repo.c:3538:11: warning: missing braces around
initializer [-Wmissing-braces]
g_auto(GVariantBuilder) builder = {0,};
Closes: #298
Approved by: cgwalters
This tries to avoid leaking GVariantBuilders and GVariants in some
situations. The leaks were usually happening when some error occurred
or because of unclear variant ownership situation.
The former is mostly about making sure that g_variant_builder_clear is
called on builders that didn't finish their variant building process.
The latter is surely more work - sometimes the result of
g_variant_builder_end() should not be passed directly to a function,
but rather stored in a g_autoptr(GVariant), sunk and then passed to a
function. IMO, with an advent of g_autoptr, GVariants should be always
sunk instead of relying on some receiver function sinking it. This
would make an easy-to-follow policy of always sinking your
variants. Functions could then assume that the passed variant is
already sunk. These leaks are still happenning in commands, but they
are less harmful, since that code will not be used by some daemon as a
library routine.
Closes: #291
Approved by: cgwalters
This adds a _with_options variant of the
ostree_repo_remote_fetch_summary function, so we can tell the fetcher
to use a specific URL instead taking it from the remote config.
Closes: #290
Approved by: cgwalters
The base URI created in this line was always (sans erroneous
situations) overwritten in the code block below without freeing it
previously, so it leaked.
Closes: #290
Approved by: cgwalters
Use markdown to actually format the tuple member descriptions as a
list. Currently they are hardly legible as gtk-doc formats them into a
single sentence.
Also update the additional metadata docs in the summary objects.
Closes: #289
Approved by: cgwalters
The deployments and booted deployment were never unreffed.
Also, remote (void) from the call to the unload function - it returns
nothing, so there is no need to fool the compiler.
Closes: #287
Approved by: cgwalters
Krzesimir Nowak