For rpm-ostree, we already link to libcurl indirectly via librepo, and
only having one HTTP library in process makes sense.
Further, libcurl is (I think) more popular in the embedded space. It
also supports HTTP/2.0 today, which is a *very* nice to have for OSTree.
This seems to be working fairly well for me in my local testing, but it's
obviously brand new nontrivial code, so it's going to need some soak time.
The ugliest part of this is having to vendor in the soup-url code. With
Oxidation we could follow the path of Firefox and use the
[Servo URL parser](https://github.com/servo/rust-url). Having to redo
cookie parsing also sucked, and that would also be a good oxidation target.
But that's for the future.
Closes: #641
Approved by: jlebon
The libcurl backend does all the work in the main thread/loop, which
seems to starve the idle scanning worker more. With the libcurl
backend, we're a lot more likely to have at least one outstanding
metadata request.
But it can more easily transiently happen with libcurl that all of our current
fetches are content. To be accurate here, just show Estimating if we're scanning
too.
Closes: #654
Approved by: jlebon
Now that we have queuing in the higher level pull logic, we don't
need to do this anymore.
It's tempting to keep it since the code diff is so small (without
completely rewriting things), but dropping it here will make
it easier to see when things go wrong at a higher level.
Note that I kept an assertion.
Closes: #654
Approved by: jlebon
Working on the libcurl backend, I didn't want to reimplement another queue. I
think the queue logic is really better done at the high level, since the fetcher
knows how we want to prioritize metadata over content, etc.
Adding another queue here is duplication, but things will look nicer when we can
actually delete the libsoup one in the next commit.
Closes: #654
Approved by: jlebon
The gzip default is 6. When I was writing this code, I chose 9 under
the assumption that for long-term archival, the extra compression was
worth it.
Turns out level 9 is really, really not worth it. Here's run at level 9
compressing the current Fedora Atomic Host into archive:
```
ostree --repo=repo pull-local repo-build fedora-atomic/25/x86_64/docker-host
real 2m38.115s
user 2m31.210s
sys 0m3.114s
617M repo
```
And here's the new default level of 6:
```
ostree --repo=repo pull-local repo-build fedora-atomic/25/x86_64/docker-host
real 0m53.712s
user 0m43.727s
sys 0m3.601s
619M repo
619M total
```
As you can see, we run almost *three times* faster, and we take up *less
than one percent* more space.
Conclusion: Using level 9 is dumb. And here's a run at compression level 1:
```
ostree --repo=repo pull-local repo-build fedora-atomic/25/x86_64/docker-host
real 0m24.073s
user 0m17.574s
sys 0m2.636s
643M repo
643M total
```
I would argue actually many people would prefer even this for "devel" repos.
For production repos, you want static deltas anyways. (However, perhaps
we should support a model where generating a delta involves re-compressing
fallback objects with a bit stronger compression level).
Anyways, let's make everyone's life better and switch the default to 6.
Closes: #671
Approved by: jlebon
What we do here basically is set things up in a `dist-hook` so that our Rust
sources are vendored at `dist` time. This gives us a single tarball still, and
ideally should be transparent to downstream builders, as long as they have the
`cargo/rust` toolchain.
Closes: #669
Approved by: jlebon
For a long time we've cached the remote configs in the repo, which
mostly makes sense for the `repo/config` file, but less sense
for `/etc/ostree/remotes.d`, because we want to support admins
interactively editing them.
One can delete the repo instance and create a new one, but that's a bit ugly.
Let's introduce an API for this so rpm-ostree can reload remotes after
admins/scripts edit them in `/etc`. We also might as well reload
any other entries in the config.
Structurually now, `ostree_repo_open()` deals with file descriptors, and then
calls `ostree_repo_reload_config()`. Except for the uncompressed cache, which is
the only thing that deals with FDs that can be configured. But we want to delete
that anyways.
No tests, since...we don't have a daemon in this codebase, don't want to shave
that yak just today.
Closes: #662
Approved by: jlebon
This is obsolete for a few reasons. The spec file is out of date (mostly the
%files, but also the BRs), and further down the line we'll need to use `make
dist` so we pick up vendored Rust sources. So the "git archive" approach won't
work for much longer anyways.
This came up in https://mail.gnome.org/archives/ostree-list/2017-February/msg00005.html
Basically, anyone who wants to build packages should look at the upstream
dist-git - until such time as e.g. Fedora learns to support pulling spec files
from upstream.
Closes: #670
Approved by: giuseppe
This is an initial drop of "oxidation", or adding implementation
of components in Rust. The bupsplit code is a good target - no
dependencies, just computation.
Translation into Rust had a few twists -
- The C code relies a lot on overflowing unsigned ints, and
also on the C promotion rules for e.g. `uint8_t -> int32_t`
- There were some odd loops that I introduced bugs in while
translating...in particular, the function always returns `len`,
but I mistakenly translated to `len+1`, resulting in an OOB
read on the C side, which was hard to debug.
On the plus side, an off-by-one array indexing in the Rust code paniced nicely.
In practice, we'll need a lot more build infrastructure to make this work, such
as using `cargo vendor` when producing build artifacts for example. Also, Cargo
is yet another thing we need to cache.
Where do we go with this? Well, I think we should merge this, it's not a lot of
code. We can just have it be an alternative CI target. Should we do a lot more
right now? Probably not immediately, but I find the medium/long term prospects
pretty exciting!
Closes: #656
Approved by: jlebon
There are many motivating factors. The biggest is simply that at a practical
level, the command line is not sufficient to build a real system. The docs say
that it's a demo for the library. Let's make that more obvious, so people don't
try to use `ostree admin upgrade` for their real systems, and also don't use
e.g. `ostree commit` on the command line outside of test suites/quick hacking.
This change will also help clarify the role of rpm-ostree, which we will likely
be renamed to "nts". Then use of the term "ostree" will become much clearer. And
similarly for other people writing upgraders, they can say they use libostree.
I didn't try to change all of the docs and code at once, because it's going to
lead to conflicts.
The next big steps are:
- Rename the github repo (github will inject a redirect)
- Look at supporting a build where we don't do `ostree admin`, or at least
it's only built for tests. We may want to split it off as a separate binary
or so? That way people with their own upgraders don't need to ship it.
Closes: #659
Approved by: jlebon
As OSTree has evolved over time, the tests grew with it. We
didn't start out with static deltas or a summary file, and the
tests reflect this.
What I really want to do is change more of the pull tests, from
corruption/proxying/mirroring etc. to use this more realistic
repo rather than the tiny one the other test creates.
We start by using some of the code from `test-pull-many.sh`, and change that
test to use `--disable-static-deltas` for pull, since the point of that test is
to *not* test deltas.
Still TODO is investigate changing other tests to use this.
Closes: #658
Approved by: jlebon
We weren't running it before. Also I switched it to use GLib. Preparation for
some oxidation work (having an implementation of bupsplit in Rust).
I exported another function to do the raw rollsum operation which is what this
test suite uses.
Closes: #655
Approved by: jlebon
I went through the Travis history a bit, and these seem to be
the flaky ones. The ubuntu one is likely no libsoup patches.
The other one @smcv has partially traced to a GPGME race condition
or something like that.
For the libsoup one; as I say in comments, once we have libcurl, I'd like to
enable that mostly everywhere, which should (hopefully) be more reliable.
Closes: #664
Approved by: cgwalters
I was working on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393545
and it was annoying that I couldn't know what the new (unsigned)
commit has was until verification succeeded. I could pull it
manually without GPG, but then it'd be sitting in the repo.
Now:
```
Updating from: fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/25/x86_64/docker-host
Receiving metadata objects: 0/(estimating) -/s 0 bytes
error: Commit 2fb89decd2cb5c3bd73983f0a7b35c7437f23e3aaa91698fab952bb224e46af5: GPG verification enabled, but no signatures found (use gpg-verify=false in remote config to disable)
```
Closes: #663
Approved by: giuseppe
This would be more likely to tickle things like
https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/601
reliably.
Also, while working on the curl backend, I hit on the fact that curl doesn't
queue (by default, you can enable) and will happily create 20000+ concurrent TCP
connections if you try. Having this test would have made that more likely to
fail.
Closes: #650
Approved by: giuseppe
There are use cases for having a single repo with branches
with different lifecycles; a simple example of what I was
trying to do in CentOS Atomic Host work is have "stable"
and "devel" branches, were we want to prune devel, but
retain *all* of stable.
This patch is split into two parts - first we add a low level "delete all
objects not in this set" API, and change the current prune API
to use this.
Next, we move more logic into the "ostree prune" command. This paves the way for
demonstrating how more sophisticated algorithms/logic could be developed outside
of the ostree core.
Also, the --keep-younger-than logic already lived in the commandline, so it
makes sense to keep extending it there.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/604Closes: #646
Approved by: jlebon
libcurl AFAICS doesn't have an API to convert HTTP code ➡️ error
string, so let's make the test regexp operate on both.
Closes: #651
Approved by: giuseppe
It turns out libsoup strips all whitespace even *inside* a URL. We could do that
for libcurl too but...really, people shouldn't do that. In this test we were
adding the trailing newline into the URL. If someone complains who is using the
libcurl code we can deal with it then.
Closes: #651
Approved by: giuseppe
This is prep for the libcurl porting. `GTlsCertificate/GTlsDatabase` are
abstract classes implemented in glib-networking for gnutls. curl's APIs take
file paths as strings, so it's easier to work on both if we move the GLib TLS
bits into the libsoup code.
Closes: #651
Approved by: giuseppe
I was making some other changes in this code, and noticed that we were adding
checksums without object types into the same hash table for metadata. We should
*never* do this with both metadata content objects, since in theory a content
object could have the same hash as metadata.
I don't actually think it's possible in practice for pure metadata to collide,
since they have different structures, but let's do this anyways since it's
conceptually right.
Closes: #651
Approved by: giuseppe
We had a lot of copies of the "echo something 1>&2; exit 1" code even though
`assert_not_reached()` was it. Hence, I think we need a shorter alias for that.
Doing this particularly since I noticed a missing `1` in an `exit 1` call in the
rpm-ostree copy of this.
Closes: #648
Approved by: jlebon
I was trying to debug `test-pull-c`, and typing `Ctrl-C` in gdb
ended up sending `SIGINT` to trivial-httpd as well, killing it.
Daemonize a bit more properly to avoid this. I also followed the standard
`/dev/null` guidelines.
Closes: #643
Approved by: jlebon
For the pending libcurl port, the backend is a bit more
sensitive to the main context setup. The delta superblock
fetch here is a synchronous request in the section that's
supposed to be async.
Now, libsoup definitely supports mixing sync and async requests, but it wasn't
hard to help the libcurl port here by making this one async. Now fetchers are
either sync or async.
Closes: #636
Approved by: jlebon
Working on the libcurl backend, I hit the issue that the trivial-httpd program
depends on libsoup. I briefly considered having two versions, but libcurl is
client only, and moreover trivial-httpd is no longer trivial - it has various
features which are used by the test suite extensively.
Hence, what we'll do is build it as a separate binary which links to libsoup,
and use it during the tests. We *also* currently still provide `ostree
trivial-httpd` since some things use it like `rpm-ostree-toolbox` and the
Cockpit tests.
After those are ported to use some other webserver, I plan to add a build-time
option to drop it.
Closes: #636
Approved by: jlebon
I'm introducing a new binary in a later patch, and it makes
sense to move more things to be common into the common section.
Also I noticed we were missing an inclusion of common `$(AM_LDFLAGS)`, though
AFAIK this doesn't break anything right now.
Closes: #636
Approved by: jlebon
The previous commit introduced a single low level API - however,
we can do things in a more optimal way for the curl backend if
we drop the "streaming API" variant. Currently, we only use
it to synchronously splice into a memory buffer...which is pretty
silly when we could just do that in the backend.
The only tweak here is that we have an "add NUL character" flag that is
(possibly) needed when fetching into a membuf.
The code here ends up being better I think, since we avoid the double return
value for the `_finish()` invocation, and now most of the fetcher code (in the
soup case) writes to a `GOutputStream` consistently.
This will again make things easier for a curl backend.
Closes: #636
Approved by: jlebon
Conceptually these now lay on top of the core API, and don't reference libsoup.
This is preparation for libcurl porting, but it's also just generally better.
Closes: #636
Approved by: jlebon
This is in preparation for the libcurl port. We're basically making public what
we had internally. The next step here is to create `ostree-fetcher-util.[ch]`
that only operates in terms of this lower level API.
Also drop the `_mirrored` from the function name since it's
the default now.
Closes: #636
Approved by: jlebon
I think originally I had envisioned this as `ostree.version`, but at the last
minute we changed it to just `version`. That's what all of the code uses, so
let's fix the docs.
Closes: #638
Approved by: paulvt
This is now the devel target, plus I think this may fix some of the
ASAN issues I'm seeing; I mostly have been using f25 for local
testing.
Also remove the MAINTAINER line since the maintainers are defined by
`git log`.
Closes: #631
Approved by: jlebon
I was having this thought today about making more of the OS readonly,
and ultimately if we got to the point where all ostree operations are
through the repo and sysroot dfds, we could have rpm-ostree be the
only process holding those fds open, and have a read-only bind mount
on top.
Anyways, we're not there, likely won't be soon, but this gets us
closer to being fully fd relative.
Closes: #628
Approved by: jlebon
I only recently realized this was possible. While we're still seeing
leaks in the CI environment for some reason, adding ASAN gives us
use-after-free detection etc., which is obviously still very useful
even if we're not doing leak checking.
Closes: #622
Approved by: jlebon
This conflicts with the ASAN work...and in general, I think I'd like
to make a new format for tests that require root, and have them be
defined to be in mutable containers or VMs.
Our coverage loss from this isn't much because some of these tests
already required `CAP_SYS_ADMIN` which we didn't have in Docker
anyways.
While we have the patient open, parallelize the regular installed
tests.
Closes: #622
Approved by: jlebon
Unfortunately, introspection uses dlopen(), which doesn't quite
work when the DSO is compiled with ASAN but the outer executable
isn't.
Trying to inject LD_PRELOAD=libasan means the outer executable has to
be leak free...which, yeah, I'm not going to get into running ASAN
today on gjs or pygobject.
So, let's skip those tests - ideally, we still run them in some other
context without the sanitizers. The coverage we have from them is
middling anyways.
Closes: #622
Approved by: jlebon
This is a migration from the origin version. It's
nicer to have it in the remote, since that's what one
needs to change. Then tools don't need to mess with
the origin file.o
In fact in this scenario one can keep the "media source" like
`file:///install/repo` or whatever, since conceptually that's where it
came from. We're just providing a better error.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/626Closes: #627
Approved by: jlebon
We were leaking in a few places that I noticed in an ASAN run. Also,
this was one of the last non-autoptr cleanup sections we have in
`out:` cleanup sections, making us a lot closer to a potential
full-tree rewrite to `return FALSE`.
Closes: #624
Approved by: jlebon
Since we stopped including the libsoup headers in `ostree-fetcher.h`,
we can now unconditionally do enum scanning, and drop a build time
conditional.
Prep for libcurl porting.
Closes: #620
Approved by: jlebon
I installed `parallel` in my dev container, which got me
the sysroot locking tests, which caught this leak when
built with ASAN.
Closes: #623
Approved by: jlebon
The "remote cookies" code broke this. While I'm not sure anyone is
actually using ostree-without-http, it isn't too hard to keep the
build time conditional going. Further, this work is preparatory for
libcurl porting.
Closes: #621
Approved by: jlebon
Due to the way glib-mkenums runs the preprocessor itself, it
doesn't pick up the `AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS()` that we have in
`configure.ac`.
This blew up in an obscure way when I later wanted to `#include
"libglnx.h"` in one of the headers, since it needs the `basename()`
from `string.h` which is only available with `_GNU_SOURCE`.
Closes: #616
Approved by: jlebon
This is what we do for non-local (i.e. HTTP) pulls; we wnat to
correctly handle being interrupted during partial pulls.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/579Closes: #613
Approved by: jlebon
This is a follow up to conversation on list - in practice, if we're
backing away from summary signing, then it makes sense to remove the
special casing for checksums in deltas around summary signatures.
This is also related to the recent change to enable GPG checking for
commits in deltas - now we have a more coherent story between the
previous pull path and deltas.
I didn't do any performance checking, and while it's slightly annoying
that we're now doing sha256 on the delta content twice (once for the
part and once per object)...sha256 is pretty fast, I think most users
are I/O bound anyways, and it'd drop even farther if we started using
openssl.
Closes: #612
Approved by: jlebon
The spam in stderr was bothering me, and further at some eventual
point in the future we want to annotate the functions with
`__attribute__((nonnull))` which would then cause tests like these to
become undefined behavior.
The coverage of this isn't worth the log spam basically.
Closes: #611
Approved by: jlebon
I am trying to track down a warning I see in `test-keyfile-utils`
which turned out to be the installed case only, but let's inject
this here too.
(The GLib default is broken, but it's hard to fix upstream without
breaking the world)
Closes: #610
Approved by: jlebon
We should be religious about the "only set output variables on
success", otherwise it makes leaks more likely.
But the real leak was us simply not using autoptr in one place.
Closes: #598
Approved by: jlebon
And "move semantics" via `g_steal_pointer()`. Just a minor code
cleanup I noticed when I was hunting for a leak, which ended up being
elsewhere.
Closes: #598
Approved by: jlebon
I find myself often wanting to debug interactively failing tests.
This makes it more convenient to keep around the temporary directories
just for those tests, rather than accumulating tons of tempdirs from
the successful tests as well.
Closes: #588
Approved by: jlebon
The fact that we weren't doing this is at best an oversight, and
for some deployment models a security vulnerability. Having both
`gpg-verify` and `gpg-verify-summary` shows that we were intending
them to be orthogonal/independent.
Lately I've been advocating moving towards pinned TLS instead of
gpg-signed summaries, and if we follow that path, performing GPG
verification of commit objects even if using deltas is more important,
as it provides an at-rest verifiable authenticity and integrity
mechanism.
Content providers which are signing their summary files and/or using
TLS (particularly pinned TLS) for transport should treat this as a
nice-to-have. However, for providers which are serving content over
plain HTTP and relying on GPG, this is a critical update.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/517Closes: #589
Approved by: jlebon
`-fsanitize=address` complained that the `refcount > 0` assertions
were reading without atomics. We can fix this by reworking them
to read the previous value.
Closes: #582
Approved by: jlebon
It turns out this is basically racy with the presence of other
threads. It was really cosmetic so let's stop doing it and make
`-fsanitize=thread` happy.
Closes: #582
Approved by: jlebon
This is actually fine in practice, but it triggers this
`-fsanitize=undefined` warning I saw in the test suite log:
```
src/libostree/ostree-repo-static-delta-compilation.c:160:10: runtime error: null pointer passed as argument 1, which is declared to never be null
```
Closes: #584
Approved by: jlebon
Conceptually we've been moving towards having our GPG verification
paths be per-remote. The code internally supports this, but we
didn't expose an API to use it conveniently.
This came up when trying to add a new `gpgkeypath` option, since
right now rpm-ostree manually finds keyrings for the remote, and
hence it wasn't looking at the keypath, and said "Unknown key"
in status.
Adding an API fixes this nicely.
Closes: #576
Approved by: giuseppe
For Project Atomic, we already have RPM signatures which use files in
`/etc/pki/rpm-gpg`. It's convenient to simply bind the OSTree remote
configuration to those file paths, rather than having duplicate key
data.
This does mean that we need to parse the files for verification, so we
end up importing them into the verifier's temporary keyring, which is
a bit ugly, but it's what other projects do.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/573Closes: #575
Approved by: giuseppe
What in the code is called "scanning" is ensuring (potentially
recursively) have an object, and if not, fetching it. And then if
it's metadata, parsing it and finding new objects to fetch.
This logic has grown fairly complex. What I'm trying to fix
right now is that if we're doing a pull-local to a remote repository
via `sshfs` (FUSE) we still end up scanning, which is inefficient.
We can take advantage of the "commitpartial" logic here - if a commit
isn't partial, it's complete, hence we don't need to scan it.
At the same time, I'm changing the logic here to *always* do scans for
dirtree objects. This will fix cases where multiple commits share
dirtree objects. We have "commitpartial" metadata, but no such concept
of partial/complete for dirtrees.
But, we'll only ever scan dirtrees if we scan commits, which is
what the section above fixes.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/543Closes: #564
Approved by: alexlarsson
Some deployments may want to gate access to content based on things
like OAuth. In this model, the client system would normally compute a
token and pass it to the server via an API.
We could theoretically support this in the remote config too, but
that'd be a bit weird for OAuth as the information is dynamic.
Therefore this cleans up the code a little bit to more clearly handle
the case that the fetcher is initialized from both remote config
data plus pull options.
Closes: #574
Approved by: giuseppe
I don't know what's going on, I suspect mirror churn. Anyways,
it seems to be consistently failing now, so let's drop it.
Closes: #571
Approved by: jlebon
Otherwise it's possible for us to exhaust available file descriptors
or (on 32 bit) run up against mmap limits.
In the rollsum case, we didn't need to hold open the "from" object
at all. And in the bsdiff case, we weren't even looking at either of
the files until we started processing.
Also, while we have the patient open, switch to using O_TMPFILE
if available.
Closes: #567
Approved by: giuseppe
We should just download the commit objects directly, as it's
obviously a lot more efficient than deltas.
I had to generate a summary file in more places in the tests,
since once created, it needs to be updated.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/528Closes: #566
Approved by: jlebon
I was doing a chain of mirroring like A -> B -> C
And repo B had A as a remote. When I added B as
a remote to C, the summary file of B had a ref
upstream:foo/bar/baz, which caused all pulls from
B to C to fail, since the summary file is only
expected to have refs, not refspecs.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/561Closes: #565
Approved by: jlebon
I'm doing builds and `make check` inside a Docker container, with
selinux on as a build-time option, but no policy in the container.
This currently aborts. Let's not do that.
(This type of thing is why installed tests are a better model)
Closes: #546
Approved by: jlebon
Colin Walters