This resolves the ambiguity for a message with a body but no subject,
and also hints that OSTree is using two bytes to store the empty
commit subject/body (when instead they could be stored, or rather,
not stored, as part of the metadata)
Closes: #305
Approved by: cgwalters
In practice, a lot of subjects are empty, because the commit date
and branch are sufficient identification. For example, rpm-ostree
does not use subjects. It also doesn't use the command-line ostree
commit tool, so this was not a problem there, but this makes the
behavior consistent.
Also adds a test that empty subjects and omitting the subject
are equivalent. The --timestamp is so that the commits do not
have different timestamps.
Closes: #305
Approved by: cgwalters
This allows automation to prefill the subject/body for the editor.
It could also be useful if some kind of "amend commit" functionality
was implemented.
Closes: #305
Approved by: cgwalters
Previously, the behavior was to run the editor if no subject or body was specified.
This led to using commit -s '' in scripts, to avoid running the editor.
In practice, manually editing commit messages is rare, whereas automated scripting
is common, so instead default to not running the editor and only run it when -e
is given.
Closes: #305
Approved by: cgwalters
Mathnerd314